Reporting back from Peace News

Over the course of Sunday and Monday I facilitated 3 two-hour workshops at the Peace News Summer Camp. I also grabbed the opportunity to pin down Milan Rai and Gabriel Carlyle, of the Peace News editorial team as well as long-term activists and movement builders, to interview them about strategy. More of that when I’ve found time to work through all 27 minutes of the recording and edit it for your delectation.

Back to the workshops… all three were well received. Inevitably there are small changes I’ll make next time round but I’d be worried if there weren’t.

What’s strategy ever done for us, co-facilitated with Rich of Seeds for Change and which I blogged about in The values of strategy, was an interesting collision of people. They included those for whom meeting the aim of a campaign is everything even if it leads us towards tactics that we don’t feel comfortable with, and those for whom the language of building strategy on the back of our existing values really resonated. To an extent it also felt like a collision of 2 agendas. We explored the question of how our values influence our strategy and then played with a couple of tools. Both could have been a 2 hour workshop in themselves. My favourite evaluation comment was that “it challenged me in the way I wanted to be challenged”. The improvements suggested included wanting to hear  strategy success stories from the facilitators’ experience of campaign groups around the UK.

Advanced facilitation was a bit of a departure for me, and one I very much enjoyed. I left the agenda open and roped in the group to facilitating all stages of it. They decided what needed to be done to set the scene, facilitating introductions and an icebreaker. They decided whether they wanted a group agreement and discussed the best ways to facilitate one, and then they listed and prioritised the facilitation issues they wanted to cover. I merely held the space for them, providing some of the pieces of the process jigsaw and chipping in with ideas from time to time. The group expressed a feeling that this approach meant that it took a while to get through the introduction and agenda setting and get to the heart of the workshop, but there was lots of learning along the way.

Public speaking brought together a spectrum of would be speakers from the quietly confident to the terrified. We spent 2 hours working on techniques to build confidence and structure an effective talk. The participants then delivered a small part of their talk to the group. Everyone felt able to engage with the practice and the energy of the group at the end was good. I split the group up for the final practice session in order to allow everyone to have a turn in the time we had. One criticism was that this reduced audience size and that some people would very much have liked to have practiced in front of the whole group. Noted.

“I found both of your workshops (advanced facilitation and public speaking) very useful, and shall endeavour to put the ideas and techniques that emerged into practice. Many thanks for coming to do the workshops” Dan – workshop participant

Peace News folk collected the evaluation forms, which included scoring the workshop as well as room for comments. They’ll crunch the numbers and send me the results in good time at which point I’ll share them with you.

Westmill Co-operative Windfarm in the distance behind the main marquee

Advertisements

One thought on “Reporting back from Peace News

  1. Here are those crunched number as promised above along with a representative sample of comments!

    STRATEGY

    Content: 8.16
    Presentation: 8.83
    What people liked:
    good and friendly facilitation, challenged me in a way I was wanting to be
    good to work through an example
    helped me see the limitations of non-strategic approach
    surprising ideas

    What could be improved:
    would have liked to explore more than one approach,
    more opinions and examples from facilitators
    very direct action focused,

    PUBLIC SPEAKING
    Content: 8.6
    Presentation: 8.4
    What people liked:
    Interactivity
    feedback
    learnt different techniques and ways in which to communicate with confidence
    was made to feel at ease with the excersises as I was very nervous
    informative and entertaining
    practical emphasis

    What could be improved:
    More time to develop own talks
    listen to other (small) groups
    everyone present 1-2 minutes of their talk to whole group with a bit of feedback

    ADVANCED FACILITATION
    Content: 8.66
    Presentation: 9.33
    What people liked:
    sharing lots of expertise
    lots of useful stuff that I will definitely use
    getting participants to set the agenda
    troubleshooting problems

    What could be improved:
    Mostly seemed to assume high level of willingness to co-operate in meetings – would be helpful to discuss extremely disruptive folk who maybe need physically removing from meetings
    practicing with mock hostile people

What do you think? Leave a comment...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s