Local groups: successes and challenges

The NGO Forum met on Thursday at WDM’s offices in London. The session focused on learning from each other about supporting local group networks. The topic was obviously a hot one as about a dozen new organisations responded to the publicity and joined the session. Many of them are at the early stages of founding networks, or wanting to grow existing small networks.

I was there, co-facilitating the session with Katharine from WDM.

After introductions and a bit of a warm up, we heard presentations on models of local organising from staff and volunteers involved in the networks of Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and Climate Camp. These 3 models had been chosen to span the spectrum from top-down organising with limited autonomy, through to the decentralised model of ‘disorganisations’ such as Climate Camp.

The questions that followed highlighted the issues for this group of capacity builders:

  • how to reach out and grow the size of a network
  • if and how NGOs utilise networks as fundraisers
  • how to deal with the ageing demographic of local campaign groups
  • the benefits of groups rather than active individuals
  • when NGOs throw volunteers in at the deep end (to deliver training to their peers, for example) how many sink, and how many swim?

The rest of the session was given over to the group, borrowing from Open Space, to set the agenda and have the conversations that were important to them.

Interestingly there wasn’t a huge demand for space on the agenda… there seemed to be some reluctance to embrace the open space which was reflected in the evaluations. Quite possibly this is because open space is still relatively new in campaigning NGO circles – it could well have been the first time many of those present had encountered it. And, because it was a relatively short session they didn’t have long to acclimatise.

As an aside, from those NGOs that have experienced open space I’ve seen a rapid rise in interest and find myself asked to use open space regularly nowadays…

Katharine took away the evaluations, so I’ll feedback on those in more detail when she sends them round.

This was a precursor to a full day skillshare on November 30th. If your organisation would benefit from being there, contact us or subscribe to the Forum email list Capacity_Building_NGO_Forum-subscribe(AT)yahoogroups.com – replacing (AT) with the @ symbol.

This is a topic we’ll come back to – we’ve experienced many different models of network and many different approaches to capacity building and support. Common themes emerge which are worth blogging about, so as always, watch this space…


2 thoughts on “Local groups: successes and challenges

  1. Here’s those evaluations I promised – these are edited highlights which summarise all the main points made:

    What went well
    Interesting Q&As
    Great to have time for a get-to-know-you icebreaker with new people attending
    Informal networking during the open space
    Good hearing from organisations with such different approaches
    Good to have time to discuss our own issues and share ideas
    Opportunity to hear the different types of structures in place was excellent as I am currently thinking about a model to implement!
    Hearing other groups’ challenges and structures
    Open space was useful
    Awesome place to establish cross NGO networks and to discuss different methods of dealing with challenges
    Meet and greet bingo – though longer would have been great
    The meeting was facilitated very well facilitated
    Good to know that the difficulties are universal!

    What worked less well
    Open space – never felt I could leave the first group I went to. Try World Café instead?
    Group structures presentations – chats could have been briefer/more detailed. Knew most of it already
    Would have been better for Q&A after 3 organisations had shared their group models to have been opened up for anyone to answer – ie, less like a ‘panel of experts’ model
    Would like it if next time you could cater for vegans too (soya milk for tea, and non-dairy biscuits)
    I personally found the open space too wide-ranging as I wasn’t ready to choose – would have preferred to hear more about more individual organisations, what their model is, key issues, then maybe identify the discussion topics as a group. But maybe this is what the full day should be for!
    Perhaps flagging up that questions/issues raised during the presentations and Q&As could be good topics to hold on to for the open space?

  2. Pingback: Open Space: the Technology, approach, free resources and critiques | rhizome

What do you think? Leave a comment...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s